Mr. Fitzgerald, [UM Public Affairs & Internal Communications]
As I read a news post which includes some of your thoughts as they relate to Campus Response Teams … at University of Michigan.
[Your statement]: “the settlement makes it ‘abundantly clear’ the lawsuit was unnecessary. …Vigorous debate on all sides of an issue has been a hallmark of this campus before and during the lawsuit. We have confidence that true diversity of thought will continue to flourish on our campus.”
I adamantly disagree. The inception, and even the existence of such ‘teams’ (and the policies which supported the formation of, and then instituted, such teams – necessitated the suit. Without doubt.
Further, I am shocked that there are (thinking) people in academia who would support such notions!
University, for me, was an unparalleled opportunity for learning and exploring New Ideas, CHOICES; University allowed me the FREEDOM to believe/ speak/ debate openly and freely [Right-Left – Middle] which, I believe, is paramount to any secondary education process.
Mr. Macintosh was on point: “the campuses which still have Bias Response Teams “inhibit our freedom of speech.” [and worse! They work to change peoples’ behavior through distasteful, intrusive policies and intimidation. “[comment]” Added my this writer, JL]
Attempts to ‘shut down’ reasonable speech [because one person, or a board, or a chairperson does not agree] is not American. The policies UM supported border on